当鲁奇尔-夏尔马不管理价值数十亿美元的基金时,他正忙于撰写有关全球市场和经济的文章｡他的最新作品是《资本主义出了什么问题》,其中他探讨了为什么即使在美国......人们对经济和资本主义也越来越失望｡资本主义(我们所熟知的资本主义)是否需要重新审视?
印度博主:美国人不信任资本主义 | 对印度的启示?
Hirenmehta
5天前(修改过)
The US/UK/EU have been more socialist (generous) with their populations post WW 2 than places like India. Those peoples enjoyed more protections, regulations, and safety nets. The key is to practice capitalism outside the country and socialism inside the country, which these countries have become efficient at doing.
与印度等地相比,美国､英国和欧盟在二战后对其人民更加社会主义(慷慨)｡这些国家的人民享有更多的保护､法规和安全网｡关键是要在国外实行资本主义,在国内实行社会主义,而这些国家已经有效地做到了这一点｡
Colonialism, military-industrial ventures, control over organizations such as the UN, World Bank, IMF, having dollar/pound as global currencies ensured low interest rates, access to resources and energy, and cheaper goods in those countries.
殖民主义､军工企业､对联合国､世界银行､国际货币基金组织等组织的控制､将美元/英镑作为全球货币,确保了这些国家的低利率､资源和能源的获取以及更便宜的商品｡
Relocating polluting factories and industries, mining, manufacturing, drilling, extraction etc. to developing and underdeveloped countries ensures the first world citizens enjoy clean air and water while still having access to resources sourced from elsewhere.On the contrary, India post-independence has only been socialist in name as most Indians were subjected to Darwin's survival of the fittest and left to fend for themselves.
将造成污染的工厂和工业､采矿､制造､钻探､开采等迁移到发展中国家和欠发达国家,确保了第一世界公民在享受清洁空气和水的同时,还能获得来自其他地方的资源｡相反,独立后的印度只是名义上的社会主义,因为大多数印度人都在达尔文的优胜劣汰法则下自生自灭｡
剩余 78%内容需要支付 10金币后可完整阅读。开通会员全网阅读，每月最低只需要3.3元。
支持付费阅读，激励作者创作更好的作品。
| 