宁德时代和中芯国际这两家中国巨头公司经常被西方智库挑出来,认为它们是两家从中国补贴中获益的公司,牺牲了外国竞争者的利益｡但是,所有工业化国家都实行政府补贴,帮助受青睐的国内产业发展｡然而,中国的独特之处在于,它可以利用其巨大的贸易顺差,以低成本进入其世界领先的供应链和物流系统,从而投资于受青睐的行业｡
中国的巨额补贴来自贸易利润,美国和欧洲的补贴则来自纳税人!
In contrast, North American and European companies who seek government incentives and subsidies are competing with other spending priorities, as all the funds come from taxpayers. This reality requires of companies seeking government help to do so through proxies, lobbying efforts, and through think-tanks who create research that can be published and used by lawmakers to justify the use of taxpayer funds.
相比之下,寻求政府奖励和补贴的北美和欧洲公司却要与其他优先支出项目竞争,因为所有资金都来自纳税人｡这一现实要求寻求政府帮助的公司通过代理人､游说活动以及智囊团来寻求帮助,这些智囊团可以发表研究报告,并被立法者用来证明使用纳税人资金的合理性｡
Ace1000ks
6天前(修改过)
The US and EU says China is subsidizing their industries, but they are doing the same thing. Industries in the EU and US are almost entirely subsidized by the government, because they are not profitable. On the other hand, China's industries are profitable.
美国和欧盟说中国在补贴他们的产业,但他们也在做同样的事情｡欧盟和美国的工业几乎全部由政府补贴,因为它们无利可图｡另一方面,中国的产业却有利可图｡
Matthewgaddy
6天前
Under the covers, this is the difference between Capitalism and a 'well-run' Socialist system...
这就是资本主义与 “运行良好”的社会主义制度之间的区别......
剩余 87%内容需要支付 10金币后可完整阅读。开通会员全网阅读，每月最低只需要3.3元。
支持付费阅读，激励作者创作更好的作品。
| 
