想象一下,北约和中国将爆发一场灾难性的战争｡我们的最新视频深入探讨了这一激烈的场景,探讨了北约与中国冲突的战略､主要参与者和潜在结果｡
想象一下,如果北约与中国开战！
Phillipcorbett
16小时前
This is absurd in thinking those Chinese Aircraft Carriers wouldn't meet their end from a B-2 strike carrying anti-ship missiles on day 2.
如果认为中国航母不会在第 2 天遭到携带反舰导弹的 B-2 打击,那就太荒谬了｡
Edwardbryan
18小时前
There's also a solid chance countries outside of NATO will join NATO like Finland did.
北约以外的国家也很有可能像芬兰一样加入北约｡
ToTrollHate
16小时前
It's all speculation No one knows how such a war would actually play out There is no accounting for luck good or bad on either side Something as simple as an untimely storm could massively change the course of a battle Which is often given as a reason for why China doesn't attack Taiwan
一切都是猜测,没有人知道这样一场战争究竟会如何发展｡双方的运气好坏无法预料,一场突如其来的暴风雨可能会彻底改变战争的进程,这也是中国为什么不进攻台湾的一个原因｡
Isasyox
14小时前
Erm… actually, This is just a ‘what if simulation’, and though it could be likely to happen, I don’t think an entire nation and their military would do what a yt vid says. Also it’s a tad bit unrealistic because he left out the Philippines and India which (if this happened) would probably be part of this.
呃......实际上,这只是一个 "假设模拟",虽然有可能发生,但我不认为整个国家和军队会像视频里说的那样去做｡另外,这也有点不切实际,因为他漏掉了菲律宾和印度,而这两个国家(如果真的发生了)可能也会参与其中｡
KentuckyBlue
12小时前
India would join even though they're in BRICS group? Maybe
印度会加入吗,即使他们是金砖国家?也许吧!
Caveman
17小时前
I like how he completely skip Philippines and India India would have a massive part in this alone.
我喜欢他完全跳过菲律宾和印度,印度将在其中扮演重要角色｡
Goldwally
14小时前
Ph is insignificant in global power struggle.
菲律宾在全球权力斗争中微不足道｡
Garryjones
13小时前(修改过)
They have No reason to intervene! The may choose to remain neutral to the conflict!
他们没有理由干预!他们可以选择对冲突保持中立!
Elimtevir
7小时前
PH is significant in location. It was a contested region during world war 2. If China attacks Taiwan US will send more troops there than japan.
菲律宾的地理位置十分重要｡在第二次世界大战期间,它是一个有争议的地区｡如果中国进攻台湾,美国将向那里派遣比日本更多的军队｡
Boyakyat
4小时前
skipping india is a good choice..india has a double face..cant even decide ftom which group it will join..
跳过印度是个不错的选择｡印度有双重面孔,甚至无法决定加入哪个集团｡
Pouthaimei
18分钟前
india will wait and calculate which side brings more profit.
印度将等待并计算哪一方带来更多利益｡
Darkfenix
18小时前
China performs slightly better than Russia would against NATO. That is to say, China suffers a strategic defeat and loses a large portion of its population instead of its entire population.
中国在面对北约时的表现略好于俄罗斯｡也就是说,中国遭受的是战略失败,损失的是大部分人口,而不是全部人口｡
Wgbbkpz
15小时前
if you only knew the truth that russia is humiliating nato in Ukraine, many US special forces are getting killed in Ukraine and some running back home traumatized, but you will soon learn the truth, the US couldn't even fight a weak Afghanistan and Ukraine is 1000 times stronger than Afghanistan
如果你知道俄罗斯在乌克兰羞辱北约的真相,许多美国特种部队在乌克兰被杀,一些人受伤回家,但你很快就会知道真相,美国甚至不能打一个软弱的阿富汗,乌克兰比阿富汗强1000倍!
Kevincloud
12小时前
NATO isn't even in Ukraine! They aren't even trying!
北约甚至没有进入乌克兰!他们甚至没有尝试!
Kaimanyu
11小时前
true, NATO fought 20 years in Afghanistan, but refuse to even fight 1 day in Ukraine... Too scared to face a real army..
没错,北约在阿富汗打了 20 年仗,却连在乌克兰打一天仗都不肯...... 不敢面对真正的军队......
Guyorsini
12小时前
And let's not forget that the US Navy wrote the book on interdicting commercial shipping way back in WW2 and quite a lot of Chinese-owned shipping ending up on the bottom of the South China Sea.
别忘了,早在二战期间,美国海军就写了一本关于拦截商业航运的书,很多中国拥有的船只最终都沉到了南中国海的海底｡
Justinmas
20小时前
So your idea is a repeat of ww2, how creative and unlikely.
所以你的想法是重演第二次世界大战,多么有创意,多么不可能｡
TheBassline
12小时前
Australia's Airforce is much larger than you stated,There is no way those 2 Chinese Carriers would get close enough for their planes to hit Australian assets.
澳大利亚的空军比你说的要大得多,那两艘中国航母不可能靠近到足以让他们的飞机击中澳大利亚资产的程度｡
Bowtiebann
17小时前
Without nuclear weapons, it all comes down to the production rate and the amount of people.
没有核武器,一切都取决于生产率和人口数量｡
Ndizzyinthehizzy
17小时前
When it comes to a war with China, one thing you have to remember is all of their equipment was made in China. When the Russia-Ukraine conflict started and people were worried about a nuclear war my main response was "Could they even launch". It's all Soviet Era weaponry. How many of them haven't been maintained?
当谈到与中国的战争时,你必须记住的一件事是,他们所有的装备都是中国制造的｡当俄乌冲突开始时,人们担心会爆发核战争,我的主要反应是“他们会发射吗?”都是苏联时代的武器｡有多少没有维护?
SpheleleNgu
19小时前
After BRICS tanks the US, and eu economies, there won't be a fight. That is happening right now
在金砖国家击败美国和欧盟经济体之后,就不会有战争了｡这正在发生!
Jamisonw
15小时前
As an Infantry veteran, my biggest concern when facing China or Russia was running out of ammo. The tech advantage might look close on paper.It's not even close to close. But as always, it comes down to logistics.
作为一名步兵老兵,在面对中国或俄罗斯时,我最担心的就是弹药耗尽｡从纸面上看,技术优势可能很接近｡ 其实根本不在伯仲之间｡ 但归根结底还是后勤问题｡
Christopherlane
11小时前
The us has no shortage of ammo.Stop the hype.
美国不缺弹药,别再炒作了｡
Elimtevir
10小时前
My dude in christ, we have prepositioned stores EVERYWHERE!we ain't running out of ammo,and besides ot will mostly be an air/missle war at the beginning. and the US is HALLA good at logistics, Like we wrote all the books on it.
我的上帝啊,我们到处都有预置仓库!我们的弹药不会用完,况且战争一开始主要是空战/导弹战｡美国非常擅长物流,就像我们写的所有关于物流的书一样｡
Killzoneops
18小时前
CHINA ROCKETS FUEL IS WATER
中国火箭的燃料是水!
Johnsonwang
14小时前
Yeah , You better believe it .The country has the largest car industry. use water to fuel its rocket seems resonable to you.
是的,你最好相信这一点,这个国家拥有最大的汽车工业｡在你看来,用水为火箭提供燃料似乎是合理的｡
Figgbx
2小时前
The world’s largest industrial power, the world‘s largest automobile exporter. Do you think these are all water?
世界上最大的工业国,世界上最大的汽车出口国｡你认为这些都是水吗?
Davidklein
18小时前(修改过)
Day 1: The US declares it unconditional surrender to China, Biden is given ice cream for a “good job”.
第一天:美国宣布无条件向中国投降,拜登因 "干得好"而获赠冰淇淋｡
Albertsunaga
17小时前(修改过)
Not realistic at all, China is currently focusing on developing anti access denial strategy by developing various long range anti ship missiles (supersonic and hypersonic included). How come naval blockade by NATO is not expected at all.
根本不现实,中国目前通过发展各种远程反舰导弹(包括超音速和高超音速),专注于发展反介入拒止战略｡为什么北约的海上封锁根本就不可能｡
StephenB
20小时前
Im not sure an attack on Japan / US bases in Japan would trigger article 5 of NATO. I don't think USA has 7 bases in Australia either. Same with UK. pretty sure they don't have 4 bases here in Aus
我不确定对日本/驻日美军基地的攻击是否会触发北约第 5 条｡我认为美国在澳大利亚也没有 7 个基地｡英国也一样｡我敢肯定他们在澳大利亚没有 4 个基地｡
DraigBlackCat
19小时前(修改过)
It wouldn’t! Article 6 of the North Atlantic Treaty states that Article 5 covers only member states' territories in Europe, North America, Turkey, and islands in the Atlantic north of the Tropic of Cancer.It has been slightly modified, but not that much.
不会!《北大西洋公约》第 6 条规定,第 5 条仅涵盖成员国在欧洲､北美､土耳其和北回归线以北大西洋岛屿的领土｡该条略有改动,但改动不大｡
Williamnunley
16小时前
That's not the point though, you think NATO is going to tell the US no we won't help?
这不是重点,你认为北约会对美国说 "不,我们不帮忙"吗?
Tomjones
17小时前
US has 11 carriers game over
美国拥有 11 艘航母,游戏结束!
Jaimevalero
5小时前
I think the pressure of economic sanctions is overestimated. These have not made a dent in the Russian economy after two years of war
我认为经济制裁的压力被高估了｡经过两年的战争,这些制裁并未给俄罗斯经济带来任何影响｡
Rainieresguer
10小时前
Knew this was nonsense when they said China uses aircraft carrier None of the Chinese equipment has been battle tested, has it?
当他们说中国使用航空母舰时,我就知道这是胡说八道,中国的装备都没有经过实战检验吧?
Yuyaplays
13小时前
I think china's opening moves against American would be very different.I think It would use its ties to North Korea to launch a land invasion of South Korea while at the same time launching missile strikes against American bases in japan Korea Guam and the Philippines.While at the same time launching an amphibious invasion of Taiwan.
我认为中国对美国的开局行动将大不相同｡我认为,中国会利用与朝鲜的关系从陆地上入侵韩国,同时对美国在日本､韩国､关岛和菲律宾的基地发动导弹袭击,同时对台湾发动两栖入侵｡
Thenotorious
18小时前
Russia moving warships and subs to Cuba and Venezuela, the enemy is taking their positions.
俄罗斯正在向古巴和委内瑞拉派遣军舰和潜艇,敌人正在占领他们的阵地｡
Dgenergene
16小时前
What China is not sure of is just how many nuclear submarines The United States and allies have patrolling inside the China Sea before?
中国不清楚的是,美国及其盟国到底有多少艘核潜艇在中国海内巡逻?
Amorris
19小时前
If this would come true. I think the USA our allies and NATO can easily handle China's missiles. China knows its a no win conflict.
如果这是真的｡我认为美国､我们的盟国和北约可以轻松应对中国的导弹｡中国知道这是一场没有胜算的冲突｡ |
