本周二,泰国庆祝两件无价文物回归｡50 年前被掠夺的两尊有 1000 年历史的铜像被归还泰国｡其中一尊被称为 “站立的湿婆”或 “金童”｡据说这是印度教神湿婆的雕像｡这座雕像于 1974 年出土,自称发现者的人说她以 3.3 万美元的价格卖给了一个外国人｡湿婆神像最终被送到了纽约大都会艺术博物馆,并在那里度过了几十年的时光｡但现在,大都会艺术博物馆决定将雕像归还｡
印度网友评论:被掠英国夺的千年 “金童”湿婆神像回归泰国!
Hypocritial
1天前
Time to replace the word "Loot" with "British"
是时候把 “掠夺”一词换成 “英国”了!
Aftermath
20小时前
Time to replace "toilet" with India
是时候用“印度”取代“厕所”了!(网贴翻译来自音飞网)
ArjoRoy
18小时前
It seems youtube doesn't have courage to handle the truth. That's why it deletes my comments. I was saying that British genocided, torchered, engineered artificial famines, and looted natives that's why the word loot for British is justified, but your hate for India is based on stereotypes, missionary hinduphobia BS hence cannot justified.
看来Youtube 没有勇气面对真相,这就是它删除我评论的原因｡我是说英国人种族灭绝､烧杀抢掠､制造人为饥荒､掠夺当地人,所以用掠夺这个词来形容英国人是合理的,但你对印度的仇恨是建立在刻板印象､传教士的印度教恐惧症､谎言的基础上的,因此是不合理的｡
Phillipchan
17小时前(修改过)
Indian properties before 1947 may not be considered as a loot.These Indian lords and Indian Kings surrendered under British rules.Because Indian lords and Indian kings surrender to Britain, The British has controlling rights to lands and properties of India before 1947.
1947 年之前的印度财产不能被视为掠夺物,这些印度领主和印度国王是在英国统治下投降的｡ 因为印度领主和印度国王向英国投降,所以英国对 1947 年之前印度的土地和财产拥有控制权｡
Strawmanfal
16小时前
Loot itself is a stolen word from Hindi.
“掠夺”本身就是从印地语中偷来的词｡
Hypocritial
8分钟前
Indian kings or Indian lords never surrendered, britishers just stabbed them in the back Britishers literally looted worth 45trillion dollars from India. It was britain who made richest country to poorest country of world and you say britishers have not looted India
印度国王或印度领主从未投降,英国人只是在背后捅了他们一刀｡ 英国人确实从印度掠夺了价值 45 万亿美元的财富｡是英国把世界上最富有的国家变成了最贫穷的国家,而你却说英国人没有掠夺印度｡
Phillipchan
2分钟前
The Indian Lord and Indian Kings surrender the lands to Britain.The wealth belongs to Britain after it was surrendered.This was call colonization of India.Don’t you know any Indian History?
印度领主和印度国王将土地拱手让给英国｡交出土地后,财富归英国所有｡这就是所谓的印度殖民,你难道不了解印度历史吗?
Porothasha
20小时前
They looted so much they even stole the word loot into their dictionaries They started with piracy on the high seas graduating to looting on land. The British together with the French looted and then burned down the Summer Palace in Beijing what they couldn't take away.
他们大肆掠夺,甚至将 “掠夺 ”一词偷入字典!他们从公海上的海盗行为发展到陆地上的抢劫｡英国人和法国人一起抢劫,然后烧毁了北京的颐和园｡
Raymondtay
1天前
Thieving is a way of life for them.
偷窃是他们的一种生活方式!
Slaysan
1天前
Did they also return the money generated from these statues over the years? If not, the criminal looters should audit there books and get the cash ready. Shameless looters!
他们是否也归还了这些雕像多年来赚取的钱财?如果没有,这些罪恶的掠夺者就应该审计账目,准备好现金｡无耻的掠夺者!
Kamandalamjal
23小时前
Countries like India do not have any International Museums at all. The share of International tourists in India is 0.00001% where as for London it is 5%. So many people would have watched these artefacts in British museums and Britain had taken care of these otherwise neglected artefacts. So India and Thailand have to pay for care charges to British.
像印度这样的国家根本没有国际博物馆｡印度的国际游客比例为 0.00001%,而伦敦为 5%｡因此,很多人都会去英国博物馆观看这些文物,而英国也会照顾这些原本被忽视的文物｡因此,印度和泰国必须向英国支付保管费｡
Sanjayshah
21小时前
And nobody begged them to take care of something belong to our country.they looted, and don't glorify such thing.if your country has gone through this u would have known.
没有人请求他们照顾属于我们国家的东西｡他们抢劫,不要美化这种事｡如果你的国家经历过这些,你会知道的｡
Adwaithbinu
20小时前
First of all.. Try to have some commonsense mahn.. And if you are saying that INDIA needs to pay the care charges.. I have one thing to say.. The amount of money that BRITISH looted from INDIA will be enough to pay that charges until the world comes to an end.. So just shut up..
首先……试着有点常识吧,伙计｡如果你是说印度需要支付护理费用…我有一件事要说……英国从印度掠夺的钱足够支付这笔费用,直到世界末日｡所以闭嘴…
Sanjayshah
1天前
I want the British to return the vast amount of India's ancient manuscripts that the British took during colonialisation .......the amount of knowledge and information contained in those manuscripts is vast.
我希望英国归还其在殖民统治期间掠夺的大量印度古代手稿 ....... 这些手稿中包含了大量的知识和信息｡
Sumchakung
1天前
Now return our kohinoor too
现在把我们的“光明之山”也还给我们吧!
Freeman
1天前
British has also stolen Greek artifacts
英国人也偷了希腊文物!
Radeonblue
1天前
If This was really shiva, WHERE IS HIS SNAKE? Where is his TRISHUL??PALKI SHARMA BEING CASUALLY MISLEADING and "Indian biased" like any other day I know that there are hindu statues in bali(they are built in a different design) But this statue above looks just like any BUDDHA statue among 1000s of buddha statues in thailand
如果这真是湿婆,那么他的蛇在哪里?他的天神在哪里?帕尔基-夏尔马像往常一样随意误导和 “偏袒印度人”｡我知道巴厘岛也有印度教雕像(它们的设计不同),但上面这尊佛像看起来就像泰国成千上万尊佛像中的任何一尊佛像｡
Harsh-iitc
1天前(修改过)
are you carry your school bag all day and wherever you go ... Yes or no Lord Shiva is depicted different in different avtars It also varies when lord Shiva is depicted in different countries . They add their own artistic approach to the statue which are seen above
你整天背着你的书包,无论你去哪里……湿婆神在不同的化身中有不同的描述,在不同的国家也有不同的描述｡他们在雕像中加入了自己的艺术手法,如上图所示｡
Circuitworm
23小时前
Shiva Depicted in different avatars?Hindu's age old way to make illogical claims Now dont claim george washington to be shivjis avatar too
湿婆的不同化身?印度教提出不合逻辑主张的古老方式,现在别再声称乔治-华盛顿也是湿婆的化身了!
Rcuitworm
18小时前(修改过)
"Golden boy" is just an austro-asiatic(khmer) depiction of Lord BUDDHA.Was shiva golden in colour? He was black-blue in complexion.It was buddha who's skin was golden in colour.Read buddhist texts andbhakts,it is clearly written that Lord buddha was golden in colour.The word "golden" in golden boy itself is self explanatory that it is a buddhist statue.
“金童”只是高棉语中对佛祖的描述｡湿婆是金色的吗?他的肤色是黑蓝色的,佛陀的皮肤才是金色的｡阅读佛教典籍和佛经,可以清楚地看到佛祖是金色的,金童中的 “金”字本身就说明了这是一尊佛像｡
Garizonmann
1天前
Disgusting how they still have the audacity to keep it isn’t it, particularly if they have obtained through force.
令人恶心的是,他们仍然厚颜无耻地保留它,不是吗,特别是如果他们是通过武力获得的｡
EvanChorm
1天前(修改过)
If both the Angkorian-style “Golden Boy” statue as well as the Angkorian-style “Kneeling Female” statue were both made in the 11th century during the Khmer Empire, and Thailand didn’t exist yet as a Kingdom until the 13th century, specifically 1238 AD, then how does it make sense that those statues are Thai and returned to Thailand?
如果吴哥风格的 “金童 ”雕像和吴哥风格的 “跪女 ”雕像都是 11 世纪高棉帝国时期的作品,而泰国直到 13 世纪(即公元 1238 年)才成为一个王国,那么这些雕像怎么会是泰国的,怎么会归还给泰国呢?
That’s as if the Turkish were to say that Byzantine Greek artifacts taken and displayed in the NYC’s MET museum should be returned to Turkey because Constantinople (present-day Istanbul) is now part of Turkey. Does it make sense to you? Because it sure doesn’t make sense to me how Khmer-style sculptures created centuries before the first Kingdom of Thailand was founded is returned to Thailand.
这就好像土耳其人说,因为君士坦丁堡(今伊斯坦布尔)现在是土耳其的一部分,所以纽约市大都会博物馆收藏和展出的拜占庭希腊文物应该归还土耳其一样｡你觉得有道理吗?因为我肯定不明白,在第一个泰王国建立之前几个世纪创作的高棉风格雕塑是如何归还给泰国的｡
Phillipchan
18小时前
Here is the deal.British looted the Khmer artifacts from Thailand.So, UK is justified to returned the artifacts back to Thailand.They were no taken from Khmer and can’t return to Khmer because it doesn’t exist today.
事情是这样的,英国人从泰国掠夺了高棉文物｡因此,英国有理由将文物归还给泰国｡他们不是从高棉被带走的,也不能回到高棉,因为高棉今天已经不存在了｡
Sreevaranasi
1天前
When will Britain return the loot from India, currently in various museums there?
英国什么时候会归还从印度掠夺来的赃物,这些赃物目前存放在那里的各个博物馆里?
Shreeraaman
1天前
I imagine that the Thais must have stolen plenty of priceless Khmer artefacts over the centuries.and should return to Khmer land.
我猜想,几个世纪以来,泰国人一定偷走了很多无价的高棉文物｡应该回到高棉的土地上｡
Phillipchan
17小时前
Where is Khmer land today?
今天的高棉土地在哪里?
PrimalRage
1天前
The Britz looted it from Thailand, and Thailand looted it from Khmer Empire....so if you want to be historically accurate, you have to returned it to Khmer modern day Cambodia.
英国人从泰国掠夺了它,而泰国又从高棉帝国掠夺了它....所以如果你想准确地反映历史,就必须把它归还给高棉人,即现代的柬埔寨｡
Sumchakungkho
1天前(修改过)
We want our kohinoor back
我们想要回我们的光明之山钻石!
Phillipchan
1天前(修改过)
The last legal transfer was recorded as a gift.It was written in British history that it was a gift to Queen Victoria.How did Britain loot the diamond from India?Do you have another story?How may Indians died protecting the kohinoor diamond?I am not British, but I am willing to protect it from lies on it.I am sure UK PM Rishi Sunak, like any loyal UK citizens, is willing to give their lives to protect this Kohinoor Diamond.
最后一次合法转让被记录为赠与,英国历史上记载它是送给维多利亚女王的礼物｡英国是如何从印度掠夺钻石的?你还有别的说法吗?有多少印度人为了保护光明之山钻石而牺牲?我不是英国人,但我愿意保护它不被谎言欺骗｡我相信英国首相瑞希-苏纳克和其他忠诚的英国公民一样,愿意用自己的生命来保护这颗光明之山钻石｡
Chakungkho
1天前
I'm surprised you even say that how can they give a royal jewel as a gift to a thief that's no gift but theft
我很惊讶你竟然说,他们怎么能把一颗皇家珠宝作为礼物送给一个小偷,这不是礼物,而是盗窃!
Caesar
1天前
Some people justify these loot as a way to protect these artifacts. Shameless.
有些人为了保护这些文物,就为这些抢劫行为辩护｡真无耻｡
jjjnathan
1天前
it is not just physical loot, it is a loot of our culture and heritage, to make us forget our past, our links to our past,
这不仅仅是物质上的掠夺,更是对我们的文化和遗产的掠夺,让我们忘记我们的过去,忘记我们与过去的联系､
Phillipchan
18小时前(修改过)
Thailand never surrendered to Britain.Thailand was never a colony of Britain.But, India rulers unconditionally surrendered to Britain.India was a colony of Britain and so everything belongs to Britain. Indian artifacts taken during British rule may not be proven as looted.
泰国从未向英国投降,泰国从来都不是英国的殖民地｡但是,印度统治者却无条件地向英国投降｡印度是英国的殖民地,因此一切都属于英国｡在英国统治期间掠夺的印度文物可能无法证明是掠夺品｡
Landgrab
1天前
When we Here of British the word loot Comes together ...
当我们说到英国,“掠夺”这个词就会浮现在我们的脑海中...
Karthikshett
1天前
Feeling sorry for Thailand because the Thai authorities still have to sign the contract that they agreed to shared the exhibition of the golden boy statue on free loan to the USA still, even after this return overdue released.
我为泰国感到遗憾,因为泰国政府仍需签署合同,同意将金童雕像无偿借给美国展出,即使在归还逾期未还的金童雕像后仍需签署合同｡
So there you go guys this is the western power or our soft power that people around the world give value on. Seriously we are not proud of what our older generation did in this sense and also think that the western should return everything that spoke for a national cultural and represent uniqueness heritage back to the original rightful owner.
所以,这就是西方的力量,或者说是我们的软实力,全世界的人都看重它｡说真的,我们并不为我们老一辈人在这个意义上的所作所为感到骄傲,我们也认为西方国家应该将一切代表民族文化和独特遗产的东西归还原主｡ |
